Search for: "Montana v. Kennedy"
Results 41 - 60
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 2:02 pm
On the jurisdictional issue, the 9th Circuit had previously adopted, in Northern California River Watch v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:15 am
US v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
” At Politico, Richard Primus points out that “the travel-ban case offers [Justice Anthony] Kennedy the chance to overrule a widely reviled decision that has never been officially overruled: Korematsu v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
” On July 11, Justice Anthony Kennedy, the justice responsible for overseeing the U.S.Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, spoke at the circuit’s 2016 judicial conference in Big Sky, Montana. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
John RobertsonWhole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:28 am
Other than perhaps the Court’s first use of “T-boned” to describe an automobile accident, there was little remarkable in yesterday’s six-to-two decision in Dietz v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:03 am
Kennedy delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:50 am
Montana on speedy trial rights and CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:12 pm
But then Justice Kennedy asked, “would your rules apply equally in a criminal case? [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm
” This theory apparently appealed to Kennedy as well. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Yesterday’s transcript in Betterman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:09 pm
Kennedy, who handles emergency legal matters from the geographic area that is the Ninth Circuit, which includes Montana. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:01 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm
There seemed to be two major threads of argument in Nebraska v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
Goldstein began the argument noting that even if tribal governments had clear but limited legislative authority, as described in Montana v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am
Finally, that Justices Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas (likely, as noted above), and possibly Alito were to disregard or significantly modify the Montana 1 analysis in the manner offered by counsel for Dollar General, it would mean that the Court’s statements favoring and assuming tribal jurisdiction in Mazurie, Colville, Montana itself, Merrion, Mescalero, National Farmers, Iowa Mutual, Strate, and Plains Commerce are to be ignored because those three or four Justices… [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
