Search for: "Montana v. Kennedy" Results 81 - 100 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
There seemed to be two major threads of argument in Nebraska v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court heard arguments in Armour v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico, Richard Primus points out that “the travel-ban case offers [Justice Anthony] Kennedy the chance to overrule a widely reviled decision that has never been officially overruled: Korematsu v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm by Ed Gehres
Goldstein began the argument noting that even if tribal governments had clear but limited legislative authority, as described in Montana v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
In a widely read Atlantic piece, James Fallows just accused the five Justices--Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito--of being part of a judicial "coup" running back to Bush v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 1:53 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
Kennedy Lecture on the United States and the World -- is that sometimes elections have served as war referenda. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:44 am
  The Supreme Court has agreed to examine the death penalty for non-homicidal child rape through the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:51 pm by cdw
The Court also decided Wood v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 8:40 am
As a result, we are likely to see a bit of tortured jurisprudence coming out of the actual case, Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Finally, that Justices Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas (likely, as noted above), and possibly Alito were to disregard or significantly modify the Montana 1 analysis in the manner offered by counsel for Dollar General, it would mean that the Court’s statements favoring and assuming tribal jurisdiction in  Mazurie, Colville, Montana itself, Merrion, Mescalero, National Farmers, Iowa Mutual, Strate, and Plains Commerce are to be ignored because those three or four Justices… [read post]