Search for: "Montgomery v. Board of Retirement"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2013, 5:53 am
The Retirement and Social Security Law excludes “large raises having the effect of inflating the members final average salary” in determining the member’s retirement allowance Chichester v DiNapoli, 2013 NY Slip Op 05283, Appellate Division, Third Department Gilbert L. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:52 am
Case Name: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
Chester County Employees’ Retirement Fund v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Under Aronson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
Additionally, under Gentile v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Salzburg et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:04 am
United States Railroad Retirement Board: The case requires the justices to determine whether, under Section 5(f) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act and Section 8 of the Railroad Retirement Act, the Railroad Retirement Board’s denial of a request to reopen a prior benefits determination is a “final decision” subject to judicial review. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Over the weekend, the news again centered on the impending retirement of Justice Stevens and the nomination of a replacement. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
Auburn Regional Medical CenterDocket: 11-1231Issue(s): Whether the 180-day statutory time limit for filing an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board from a final Medicare payment determination made by a fiscal intermediary, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
Rose v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Mukasey Board of Immigration Appeals 08a0771n.06 Pe Win v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Mukasey Board of Immigration Appeals 08a0771n.06 Pe Win v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Board of Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan 14-723Issue: Whether, under the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), a lawsuit by an ERISA fiduciary against a participant to recover an alleged overpayment by the plan seeks “equitable relief” within the meaning of ERISA Section 502(a)(3), 29 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
Congratulations to those who picked Montgomery v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Alabama and Montgomery v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:11 am
Board of Education decision. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Graham v. [read post]
