Search for: "Moore v Volokh"
Results 61 - 80
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
Eugene Volokh, Kansas Voters Reject Repeal of State Constitutional Abortion Rights, by >58%-42% Margin, Reason: The Volokh Conspiracy (Aug. 2, 2022, 11:43 PM), https://reason.com/volokh/2022/08/02/kansas-voters-reject-repeal-of-state-constitutional-abortion-rights-by-60-40-margin [https://perma.cc/X3PG-DYAV]. [6]. 142 S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:08 am
Ct. 1979); O’Reilly v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:45 pm
The case, McKenna v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 10:16 am
Today's 8-1 decision in Ramirez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Moore, 666 F.3d 313, 320 (4th Cir. 2012); United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:01 am
Riviera Beach (scope of First Amendment claims for retaliatory arrest), Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:01 pm
[The Volokh Conspiracy / Washington Post] * A nice little maxim (get it?) [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
From Myers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 10:42 pm
In cross-posts at Volokh and SCOTUSblog, Orin Kerr takes issue with the government’s litigation strategy in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, the material witness/Fourth Amendment/qualified immunity appeal in which the Supreme Court is set to hear argument on Wednesday. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 7:51 pm
Professor Jonathan Adler over at the Volokh Conspiracy has a post discussing the Sixth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
See generally Volokh, supra, at 463–65. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
From Mumma v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 1:02 pm
Supreme Court in Packingham v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 444 (1934) Dames & Moore v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am
See generally Volokh, supra, at 463–65. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:03 am
But beyond that, the Texas Supreme Court expressly held in Kinney v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 7:31 am
It’s back to the future in Alabama for same-sex marriage: Judge Callie V. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:56 pm
1 Moore v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
"Allowing different remedies in state law cases heard in federal courts on pendent jurisdiction would undermine the 'twin aims of the Erie rule: discouragement of forum-shopping and avoidance of inequitable administration of the laws.'" LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
