Search for: "Moore v. Barge" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2021, 10:09 am by Edward T. Kang
In the alternative, they alleged that the individual defendant, an “old and infirm riverman,” participated in the company’s negligent mooring of a barge. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court’s 2017 ruling in Moore v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:24 am by Anthony B. Cavender
The injunction halted the operation of a barge mooring facility that had been authorized by the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:13 pm by Frederick B. Goldsmith
Moore–McCormack Lines, Inc., 386 U.S. 724, 726, 87 S.Ct. 1410, 1412, 18 L.Ed.2d 482 (1967); Poignant v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:52 am by Steven Cohen
 He also opines as to the judgment of the Dale Heller’s mooring and transit decisions on both days. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:31 am by John McFarland
The facility is essentially a mile and a half parking lot for mooring of up to 200 barges that carry oil, chemicals and hazardous cargo. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:10 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Accordingly, the captain of a tugboat involved in the project moored the tugboat and its barge adjacent to a dock in the staging area. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:10 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Accordingly, the captain of a tugboat involved in the project moored the tugboat and its barge adjacent to a dock in the staging area. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:31 am by Will Bland
  These principles were discussed in Conagra, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
At all times material, defendant Foss Maritime Company (Foss) was a corporation doing business in the Southern Division of the Western District of Washington, was the owner and operator of the tug JUSTINE FOSS and Barge Z Big 1, and employed plaintiff as a member of the crew of the tug JUSTINE FOSS. 3. [read post]