Search for: "Moore v. Board of Education" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2024, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
In her brief on the merits, Gonzalez contends that instead of Nieves, the court of appeals should have applied the court’s 1977 decision in Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Board of Education by cobbling together nine members on a fairly narrow, but momentous decision. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
Ireland On Monday 5 December 2022, judgment was handed down in the High Court of Ireland in Moore v Harris & Anor; Morris v Harris & Anor (Approved) [2022] IEHC 677. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am by Alex Phipps
Here, the court found that “Graham County Schools” similarly imported the Graham County Board of Education. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the exercise of constitutional rights “may be regulated by the Oireachtas when the common good requires this” (Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IR 294, 312 (HC; Kenny J) affd [1965] IR 294, 345, [1965] IESC 1 (3 July 1965) [23] (Ó Dálaigh CJ; Lavery, Kingsmill Moore, Haugh and Walsh JJ concurring); see, recently, Burke v Minister for Education [2022] IESC 1 (24 January 2022) [95]… [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Remarkably, there are state and federal court judges who continue to misunderstand and misinterpret regulatory risk assessments, notwithstanding efforts to educate the judiciary. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Cover’s insights suggests both the power and permanence of these nomic contests within an international law that has at once lost its moorings in public law but is building new foundations of authority and action interlinked with but distinct from public law. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am by Nedim Malovic
The applicant appealed to the EUIPO Fourth Board of Appeal (the board) solely on the ground of bad faith within the meaning of Articles 59(1)(b) of the EUTMR. [read post]