Search for: "Moore v. Commonwealth" Results 1 - 20 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:37 pm by Nicki Milionis
By: Nicki Milionis and Michael McCrae with thanks to Yasmine Sahihi and Amy Moore for their contributions Victoria’s first industrial manslaughter decision pursuant to section 39G of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (OHS Act) was handed down in the Supreme Court recently in R v LH Holding Management Pty Ltd & Hanna [2024] VSC 90 (R v LH). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:28 am by Tom Miller
Moore, applying Bruen to invalidate the firearms licensing scheme in Maryland. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:41 am
Moore, University College London Faculty of Laws, is publishing Salomon vs Salomon in Landmark Cases in Company Law (V. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:41 am by Christine Corcos
Moore, University College London Faculty of Laws, is publishing Salomon vs Salomon in Landmark Cases in Company Law (V. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 3:35 am by Jon Katz
Commonwealth of Virginia, 258 Va. 576, 583; Moore v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
"Allowing different remedies in state law cases heard in federal courts on pendent jurisdiction would undermine the 'twin aims of the Erie rule: discouragement of forum-shopping and avoidance of inequitable administration of the laws.'" LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 9:32 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The district court here compared the restrictions in this matter with those followed in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
"Allowing different remedies in state law cases heard in federal courts on pendent jurisdiction would undermine the 'twin aims of the Erie rule: discouragement of forum-shopping and avoidance of inequitable administration of the laws.'" LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:52 pm by Jennifer Lynch
” This ruling is in line with a recent opinion from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in another case involving long-term pole camera surveillance: Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:09 am by Edward T. Kang
 The Commonwealth Court had previously confronted Wicks’s ostensible bar to inaction liability in another environmental law case, Kaites v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
The riotous insurrection at the Washington Capitol building on January 6th is a good example of this truth: “The strength of a nation’s rights, freedoms and rule of law lies not in its Constitution but in its politics. [read post]