Search for: "Moore v. Mills" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2011, 6:43 am by Bexis
We found the decision in Mills v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:58 am by Philip Thomas
In this post in January I wrote about a discrimination lawsuit by Sherrie Moore against the Allen, Cobb, Hood and Atkinson law firm based in Gulfport. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:03 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Richard Buxton (Solicitors) v Mills-Owens & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 122 (23 February 2010) Franked Investment Group Litigation Test Claimants v Inland Revenue & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 103 (23 February 2010) National Grid Plc v Gas and Electricity Markets Authority & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 114 (23 February 2010) High Court (Patents Court) Intervet UK Ltd v Merial R. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:00 pm
RANDI LYNN was moved to a mooring buoy at nearby Chenega, where divers began temporary repairs with wedges, caulking, and plywood patches. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Nate Russell
The correct test for demonstrating prima facie discrimination per Moore v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:11 am
The questions, from reading the transcript of Friday's hearing about the Scruggs deposition (see below for a link, it was in yesterday's post), included many about how much Scruggs and Hood cooperated in linking civil litigation and criminal investigations, when both of them began working with the Rigsby sisters, Mike Moore's involvement, and many, many "Moore. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
This post is the third part of a four-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
  For reasons even beyond the ones he expresses.Admittedly, Justice Moore's majority opinion makes a ton of sense. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
Judge Moore forcefully dissented, urging the court not to extend the Bowers rule, which she believed was different than a procedural or legal error.In United States v. [read post]