Search for: "Moore v. Parole Board" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 9:40 pm by Jeff Welty
The high court granted review this week in a case that will determine whether Miller v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Alabama applies to discretionary sentences of life without parole imposed for juvenile offenses, as 16 states have held, or whether it is limited to mandatory sentences of life without parole, as 10 others have found; and (2) whether an evidentiary hearing is required to assess whether juveniles sentenced before Miller are irreparably corrupt. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am by Marcia Shein
A16A1650 (March 10, 2017) The Board of Pardons and Paroles’ decision to grant a pardon is not reviewable by the courts, though the courts may interpret the scope of the pardon based on the Board’s pardoning language. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm by Leiza Dolghih
Parel, the Eighth Court of Appeals held that a letter to a parole board from a client’s attorney did not arise from “the sale of goods, services or insurance product. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
As attorney general, he became known for his removal of Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore for Moore’s refusal to follow a federal court order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
Moore, 520 F.3d 616 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 2000 U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In issuing its order, a divided Court noted that the "unique problem presented by this case is that Moore has not asked for a stay. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am by Barry Sookman
The FairPlay coalition comprising more than 25 organizations representing hundreds of thousands of members of Canada’s creative community made a reasonable proposal to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), Canada’s telecommunications and broadcast regulator, to address the scourge of online copyright infringement.[1]  The proposal, which involves website blocking, was immediately attacked by anti-copyright activist Michael Geist… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]