Search for: "Moore v. Regents of University of California"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
Recent law, however, has sided with pharmaceutical companies by stating that tissues removed through a medical procedure can, in fact, be used for "medical research" or commercial purposes without the consent of their donor (Moore v. the Regents of the University of California). [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
Regents of the University of California, 271 Cal. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:40 pm
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
9 May 2008, 3:08 pm
Regents of the University of California 81% The Peevyhouses, of Peevyhouse v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120 (Cal. 1990) The Boyds from Boyd v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
The case is Olson v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:55 pm
Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479, 51 Cal.3d 120 (1990). [read post]
