Search for: "Moore v. Stephens" Results 1 - 20 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 1:56 am
Stone and Rolls (in Liquidation) v Moore Stephens (a Firm) House of Lords “A company, exclusively controlled by a single director so as to be primarily liable for frauds committed against third parties, could not bring a claim for damages against its auditors on the basis that they had failed to detect the fraudulent activities, that they [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:55 am
Stone & Rolls Ltd (in liquidation) v Moore Stephens (a firm) [2009] UKHL 39; [2009] WLR (D) 277 “A company, which was in the exclusive control of its sole director and shareholder so as to be primarily liable for frauds committed against third parties, could not bring an action for damages against its auditors on the [...] [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
Stephens, No. 15-8049.Moore has stated two "questions presented" in his petition. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:59 am
Moore Stephens (a firm) (Respondents) v Stone Rolls Limited (in liquidation (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 39 (30 July 2009) Lexington Insurance Company (Respondents) v AGF Insurance Limited (Appellants) and one other action Lexington Insurance Company (Respondent) v Wasa International Insurance Company Limited (Appellants) and one other action [2009] UKHL 40 (30 July 2009) Fisher (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v [...] [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:40 am by Andrew Hamm
The Court also called for the views of the Solicitor General in two cases, Moores v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s grants in Moore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by Brian Stull
As Justice Stephen Breyer forecasted two terms ago in Glossip v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by WSLL
Stephens of Thomsen Stephens Law Offices, Idaho Falls, Idaho; John D. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:13 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
On her Twitter feed, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Elsa Alcala notes that she wrote dissenting opinions in two of the six petitions being considered in conference at SCOTUS today - Moore v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:13 am
China Arbitration: Conflict and Cooperation in Troubled Waters Hui Zhong & Michael White, South China Sea: Its Importance for Shipping, Trade, Energy and Fisheries Matthew Stubbs & Dale Stephens, Dredge Your Way to China? [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:58 am by Matthew Nelson
While the gaze of the eDiscovery community has been firmly transfixed on the unfolding drama in the Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]