Search for: "Moore v. Stone" Results 1 - 20 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 1:56 am
Stone and Rolls (in Liquidation) v Moore Stephens (a Firm) House of Lords “A company, exclusively controlled by a single director so as to be primarily liable for frauds committed against third parties, could not bring a claim for damages against its auditors on the basis that they had failed to detect the fraudulent activities, that they [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:55 am
Stone & Rolls Ltd (in liquidation) v Moore Stephens (a firm) [2009] UKHL 39; [2009] WLR (D) 277 “A company, which was in the exclusive control of its sole director and shareholder so as to be primarily liable for frauds committed against third parties, could not bring an action for damages against its auditors on the [...] [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:01 am by randywallace
From the 1960 Missouri Court of Appeals case of Moore v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:59 am
Moore Stephens (a firm) (Respondents) v Stone Rolls Limited (in liquidation (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 39 (30 July 2009) Lexington Insurance Company (Respondents) v AGF Insurance Limited (Appellants) and one other action Lexington Insurance Company (Respondent) v Wasa International Insurance Company Limited (Appellants) and one other action [2009] UKHL 40 (30 July 2009) Fisher (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v [...] [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:49 pm
Peter Moore es un hombre de 45 años de edad que recientemente fue víctima de un accidente automovilístico donde el chofer del auto que lo golpeó se dio a la fuga. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm by Jason Mazzone
The important exception is the Seventh Circuit panel's decision in Moore v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
Today, the court will hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
  The Appellants assert that the House of Lords decision in Stone and Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [1] (in which the liquidators of Stone and Rolls were unable to pursue a claim against the company’s auditors for failure to detect a fraud perpetrated by Stone and Rolls’ sole director and shareholder) applies to the facts in this case thereby preventing Bilta (itself now in liquidation) from making any claim. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
In any event, one of the cases critical to the ultimate decision in this en banc appeal will be California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. [read post]