Search for: "Moore v. Superior Court" Results 141 - 160 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 4:42 pm by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 defense to certain arbitration agreements. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:54 pm by Will Bland
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeal, in the matter of Sander v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts The hearing of the appeal in Ambrosadiou v Coward took place on Monday 21 March 2011. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
Moore-Bick LJ said “Finally, it is necessary to mention briefly the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of MGN v The United Kingdom (Application No. 39401/04), in which the court held that the award of costs in favour of Miss Campbell against MGN that included a success fee (upheld in Campbell v MGN (No. 2)) involved an infringement of the defendant’s right to free speech. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am by INFORRM
In Canada, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded Can $50,000 general damages and Can$25,000 punitive damages in an internet defamation case. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:53 am
Porter Keadle Moore, LLP, Inserra and Bryan, Case No. 2010-CV-199891 (filed December 29, 2010, Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (click here for the Complaint).. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
 BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 3:16 am
The right to privacy in the workplace asserted Moore’s situation, said the court, must bend to the superior governmental-societal interest of efficiency in the State Police. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]