Search for: "Moore v. United Property " Results 101 - 120 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm by Rory Little
United States in 2015 (holding that a fish is not a “tangible object” under the federal obstruction of justice statute) and Bond v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 6:44 am by Paul Stephan
Confiscation, however, is irreversible: once a state transfers ownership to someone else, it cannot resume its duty to respect the foreign state’s property once the foreign state stops breaking the law. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am by Kelly
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:52 am by Steven Cohen
 He also opines as to the judgment of the Dale Heller’s mooring and transit decisions on both days. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
After taking custody of the isotopes, the United States filed an interpleader action to determine possessory and ownership rights to the property. [read post]