Search for: "Morales v. Apple Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Apple, Inc., plaintiffs sought to hold Apple liable for having games on their app store with “features legally equivalent to slot machines. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
., published by CDC, revealed that pork meat was the second most important source of foodborne Salmonella outbreaks.[6] In pork meat, pigs and swine, and the swine farm environment, the prevalence of Salmonella is 39.6%, 17.7%, and 7.9%, respectively.[7] Cargill, Inc., the largest private corporation in the United States,[8] has been implicated in several Salmonella outbreaks, particularly in ground beef and turkey products. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
But it wasn't just technology vs content: two major platforms, Spotify and Deezer, urged European legislators to ensure that the globally dominant giant US technology companies (primarily Apple, Amazon and Google) don't abuse their position as gatekeepers to digital consumers, not least as all three tech giants make and operate devices, control transaction platforms and own content services. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
, Morgan Stanley and Viacom Inc. at odds with the Trump administration. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
 Fujifilm v AbbVie: practice, procedure and policy analysisGuest Kat Eibhlin Vardy summarizes the Rapid Response event organized by AIPPI on the case Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Company Limited v AbbVie Biotechnology Limited, [2017] EWHC 395 (Pat), from the perspective of patent and competition law.Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 2 - SOULUXE - likelihood of confusionGuest Kat Rosie Burbidge recaps the case SoulCycle Inc v Matalan Ltd,… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
   CSR, then, occupies a conceptual space between the social and the legal, and between the moral and legal order. [read post]