Search for: "Morales v. Jones et al" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 12:42 am by Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie
Urban Outfitters Inc. et al (Case number 1:12-cv-00195).Professor Ewelukwa concluded by stating that there are several questions which Africans and Nigerians must ask viz: What are the IP needs and expectations of holders of traditional knowledge/cultural property? [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1062 (6th Cir. 1998), we affirm. 07a0438p.06 Smith, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
  The Court also denied cert. in Jones v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Marcovitz, (Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 153-176, 2009).Dimitry Kochenov, On Options of Citizens and Moral Choices of States: Gays and European Federalism, (Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009).Heather Kennedy, Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:10 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KZ6687 .C37 2018Stuart Casey-Maslen et al., Drones and Other Unmanned Weapons Systems Under International Law (Leiden: Brill, Nijhoff, 2018). [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
[iv] Per Les Industries Lumio (Canada) Inc. v Denis Dusablon et al, 2007 QCCS 1204, (CST 700-17-001314-037, March 20, 2007) at para. 182. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 But even leaving aside these more technical matters relating to the standard of proof at trial, and whether the Trust had met it, and looking at these private student loan default cases solely as morality tales, the Houston Court of Appeals cannot be said to have delivered a morally righteous and equitable result. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Rees, et al., 217 S.W.3d 307 (Ky. 2006).........7 Brown v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am by New Books Script
l al-fiqh / by Ihsan Abdul-Wajid Bagby. 1986 v, 244 leaves ; 28 cm. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
In order to do that well, a lawyer needs to be neutral on the moral merits of the client’s lawful objectives. [read post]