Search for: "Morales v. New York" Results 261 - 280 of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 5:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Stephen Bilkis and Associates with its New York Criminal Lawyers to defend your rights under the law. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Stephen Bilkis and Associates with its New York Criminal Lawyers to defend your rights under the law. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:25 am by David Cheifetz
He published many articles both in technical law journals and also in the New York Review of Books, none more important than his critique in several articles in 1977 and 1978 of the supreme court's inconclusive decision of the Regents of the University of California v Bakke case, which arose out of widespread dissatisfaction with "affirmative action", or positive discrimination. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be… [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.* However, as the Court of Appeals said in Stega v New York Downtown Hosp., 31 NY3d 661, an allegedly defamatory "statement is subject to a qualified privilege when it is fairly made by a person in the discharge of some public or private duty, legal or moral, or in the conduct of his own affairs, in a matter where his [or her] interest is concerned. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Rice, State University of New York at Plattsburgh, “Bacon’s Rebellion in Indian Country,” Journal of American History 101 (December 2014). [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.* However, as the Court of Appeals said in Stega v New York Downtown Hosp., 31 NY3d 661, an allegedly defamatory "statement is subject to a qualified privilege when it is fairly made by a person in the discharge of some public or private duty, legal or moral, or in the conduct of his own affairs, in a matter where his [or her] interest is concerned. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:55 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Resolving Juror Confusion New York’s Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court’s recent case of Burwell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:02 am
Final administrative determination for the purposes of determining the statute of limitationsSkiptunas v State of New York, App. [read post]