Search for: "Morales v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am by Dave
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am by Dave
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Barrett dissented, concluding that the Department of Homeland Security’s interpretation was reasonable. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:44 pm
Not only did the Court deny Ex-Husband’s request to terminate alimony but the Court also wrote a letter to the IRS, State Division of Taxation, the Sussex County Prosecutor and the Social Security Administration. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm by James R. Marsh
The Social Security Administration denied her claim, and Ms. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am by Garrett Hinck
The Supreme Court stayed the Ninth Circuit’s September 7 decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by ACLU
For example, the administration must rescind Trump-era rules that weakened protections for beneficiaries of government-funded social services by eliminating requirements that religious providers refer individuals who ask for a secular alternative and notify individuals of their rights. [read post]
To remind us that legislators may appeal to their own moral convictions and to claims about social utility to reshape the law as they think it should be in the future. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:45 am by Jack Howell
Employers are liable for FICA (Social Security) taxes on wages paid to their employees. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
  Access to recorded classes will be controlled via a secure course management platform, such as ANGEL, and will be restricted to students enrolled in the recorded course, the professor, and those University IIT personnel necessary to maintain the system. [read post]