Search for: "Morales v. White et al" Results 1 - 20 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Trinity applied for judicial review, seeking an order declaring that the LSUC’s decision … Frank et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 6:28 pm by Georgialee Lang
McCorkell), deceased, et al., 2016 CanLII 34017 SCC) National Alliance, a white supremacy group in West Virginia, was gifted a collection of valuable coins from ancient Rome and Greece, an antique Iranian sword, and other artifacts and investments said to be worth a minimum of $250,000 and as much as $1 million dollars. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Blume, et al. argue that there are compelling reasons to read McCleskey narrowly. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
He quoted extensively from the Missouri case of Eyerman et al v Mercantile Trust Co. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:10 pm
Today the Connecticut Supreme Court heard arguments from the parties in Kerrigan et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
”48 Werden et al. argue that the entire range of criminal sanctions must be available for convicted antitrust offenders, from corporate and individual fines to individual imprisonment. [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:50 pm by Jon
But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.Concurring, Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of United Retired Firefighters Association and The American Legion Department of CaliforniaAmicus brief of Foundation for Moral LawAmicus brief of American Center for Law and Justice et al.Amicus brief of Texas et al.Amicus brief of David EpsteinAmicus brief of Family Research Council et al.Amicus brief of Rear Admiral Jeremiah Denton, USN (Ret.) et al.Motion of Pacific Justice Institute to withdraw… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Stone, et al., Constitutional Law (Aspen Law & Business, 4th ed., 2001): 331-419. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am by Roger Clegg
By the way, the social-science evidence that there are compelling educational benefits that outweigh the costs is underwhelming, as discussed in the amicus briefs filed in Fisher by Abigail Thernstrom et al., Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., Gail Heriot et al., the Pacific Legal Foundation et al., (including my organization), and a group of economics and statistics scholars. [read post]