Search for: "Morgan v. State Board of Equalization" Results 41 - 60 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
It’s Not Clear How They Would Do That Center for Responsive Politics – Jessica Piper | Published: 8/2/2019 Matching – when campaigns tell donors that their contributions will be equaled or multiplied by an unknown source – has emerged as a relatively common fundraising tool among groups across the political spectrum in recent years. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:56 am by David Hart QC
Now to the South African case, the simplified title of which (Biowatch v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
“In particular, the transaction-processing costs on which the Board based the base component have nearly halved. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Fox, a former OFCCP official and current president of Fox, Wang & Morgan P.C. in San Jose, California. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 am by imlablog
Bottum of Morgan Theeler LLP in Mitchell, South Dakota, who represents Richard Vendrig. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Some parts of the Bill are organized similar to the Canada Labour Code, from employment standards to health and safety, to unionized workplaces, as follows: PART I: Preliminary Matters PART II: Employment Standards PART III: Occupational Health and Safety PART IV: Appeals and Hearings re: Parts II and III PART V: Radiation Health and Safety PART VI: Labour Relations PART VII: Public Service Essential Services (Place Holder) PART VIII: Labour-Management Actions (Temporary Measures During… [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 8 June 2016, Stephens J gave a judgment in Board of Governors of Campbell College v Independent News and Media ([2016] NIQB 51). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master… [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am by Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
Board of Education wherein the Supreme Court held that separate but equal facilities in public accommodations unconstitutional in 1954. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In the resulting decision, Freedom Holding, Inc. v Haart (2022 NY Slip Op 22225 [Sup Ct, NY County July 20, 2022]), Justice Hoffman rejected Haart’s assertion that Delaware law applied across the board to Freedom and Scaglia’s claims simply by virtue of the entity’s incorporation in Delaware. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism:… [read post]