Search for: "Morillion v. Royal Packing Co"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
Royal Packing Co. and Aguilar v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 6:32 am
Royal Packing Co. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:36 pm
Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal. 4th 575 (2000). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, Aguilar v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:09 pm
(See Morillion v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
Co., 721 F.Supp.2d 804, 820 (N.D.Ill.2010) (time rounding and log-out policies may violate FLSA if they “cause[ ] plaintiffs to work unpaid overtime”); Austin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 8:00 am
” See Morillion v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:43 pm
Royal Packing Co.), the Court held:It is undisputed that Metson allocated eight hours of the twelve hours of off-duty, standby time for sleeping and required plaintiffs to sleep aboard ship during their 14 day hitches. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:38 am
Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal. 4th 575, 578 (2000). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 584 [citing to DLSE Opinion Letter (“O.L. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:58 am
The Ninth Circuit, relying on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Morillion v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:53 pm
LEXIS 4278, at 40-44 (citing Morillion v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:45 pm
Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal. 4th 575 (2000). [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:43 am
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 1:32 am
The court also noted that it is not required to follow the DLSE opinion on the matter, citing Murphy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 6:22 pm
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575) [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 578. [read post]