Search for: "Morris v. Collins" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2007, 2:11 am
 Marks & Spencer v Freshfields was a case in point and the Court of Appeal itself observed in upholding his first instance judgment that "Lawrence Collins J's experience of matters such as this is unequalled amongst the judges of the higher courts". [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:46 pm
I’m pretty sure that Judge Bea didn’t intend to give me a chuckle in the first paragraph of his opinion in Collins v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
Re Kooperman is cited in Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws (“Dicey”), paragraph 31-084 as an example of how the English Courts may, in certain circumstances, circumvent the immovables rule: “A foreign trustee who would otherwise be met by the obstacle contained in this Rule may be able to mitigate its effect if the English court, in [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 11:21 pm by Maria Hook
 Dicey, Morris and Collins had suggested the existence of this exception for many editions, but it had to be inferred from earlier cases without being properly articulated. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:34 pm by Jeanne Huang
Dicey, Morris and Collins The Conflict of Laws (15th ed) 14-085. [9] Rainford v Newell-Roberts [1962] I.R. 95. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
The book tells the story of an amazing multi-media sendoff Philip Morris gives for Powell, a longtime board member who was leaving to join the court. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:48 am
Simpson, Shareholder,  Cotkins & Collins, Los Angeles His principal area of practice is insurance coverage for environmental liability and he represented the state of California in the State of California v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
In view of the above conclusions, Collins J finds that Mr Morris was wrong in a) and b). [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:56 am
Report From This Morning’s Argument At the argument, Daniel Collins represented Phillip Morris, and Mark Robinson represented the plaintiffs. [read post]