Search for: "Morris v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
A tip of the cyberhat to Kennedy Simpson over at Thompson, Morris & Simpson for passing along the good news that reconsideration was just denied in the generic drug preemption case, Morris v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:57 am
Sean Wajert tells us of a remarkable failure-to-warn case, Steven Morris v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 5:40 am
Freedom From Religion Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:52 am
Professor Benjamin Zipursky of Fordham School of Law has posted an article on SSRN entitled Punitive Damages After Philip Morris v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:08 pm
The Supreme Court decided Hemphill v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:57 pm
The cost to Philip Morris of trying to slant jury instructions too far in its favor -- $79.5 million in punitive damages: As I first noted in this post from this morning, today the Supreme Court of Oregon issued its ruling, on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, in Williams v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Morris James partner Lewis H. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 2:48 pm
The case was brought by three Maine smokers who accused Philip Morris [corporate website [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:26 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, March 31, 2023, Philip Morris v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 3:12 am
The federal district court in San Diego issued a fascinating opinion last week in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:51 am
Morris v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:49 am
Criminal Procedure Jury instructions; ineffective assistance; judicial recusal Morris L. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:13 am
Criminal Procedure Plea withdrawal; ineffective assistance Morris L. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:20 am
The State of New Jersey has not enacted such a law. [read post]
13 Aug 2004, 5:58 am
Philip Morris faces similar lawsuits in at least 11 other states. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:58 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 3:00 pm
Cir. 2022) (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:58 pm
The plaintiffs in Altria v, Good, 501 F. 3d 29 (1st Cir. 2007) alleged that Phillip Morris violated state laws prohibiting fraudulent misrepresentation in its false promotions and advertising for Marlboro and Cambridge Lights as "Light" with "Lowered Tar and Nicotine" when in fact the "Light" cigarettes would not deliver any less tar or nicotine to the smoker. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:02 am
In Morris v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
