Search for: "Morrisey v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
That may now occur in West Virginia where Attorney General Patrick Morrisey wants a federal court to throw out a lawsuit attempting to remove Donald Trump from the ballot in the state. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:11 am
Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:08 am
Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:06 pm
"] From Blankenship v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 10:31 am
First, R v Smithers, 1977 CanLII 7 (SCC), states that the Crown must prove factual causation. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
In the 2015 case of Reed v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:16 am
Morrisey-Berru, 140 S. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 11:52 am
Morrisey v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 1:54 pm
Morrisey v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:43 pm
In a 7-to-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm
Section 49 states that an individual who has contravened or failed to comply with an order or the Act is liable to a maximum fine of $10,000 or imprisonment of up to 6 months or both for a first offence and up to additional fines of up to $1,000 a day if the offence continues (fines increase to a maximum of $25,000 or up to 12 months imprisonment for subsequent offences or both and a maximum of $25,000 for each day the offence continues). [read post]
19 May 2020, 11:14 am
Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:54 pm
Morrisey-Berru and St. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 5:39 pm
Morrisey-Berru and St. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Morrisey v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:19 am
In J&K Tile Company v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Ricks v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:42 pm
(“Under Morrisey v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
Reversing and remanding a state circuit court’s decision to issue a preliminary injunction that temporarily halted the law’s implementation, the state high court found the court below abused its discretion in issuing the injunction because the unions were unlikely to succeed on the merits of their constitutional claims and no other appellate court in the country had struck down even one of the many similar laws of other states (Morrisey v. [read post]
