Search for: "Morrison v. White" Results 81 - 100 of 245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court has held that Morrison v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
Before joining Morrison & Foerster, Deanne was an assistant to the US solicitor general. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:50 pm by David Lat
Similar arguments carried the day in our recent Above the Law / Dealbreaker debate over the sentencing of white-collar criminals. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
Last Monday, I wrote a lengthy post about why Congress should pass the pending, bipartisan bills to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller from being fired without good cause—and why the proffered constitutional objections to that legislation are based upon a combination of unsubstantiated (and contestable) assumptions about the current Supreme Court’s willingness to overturn Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:22 am by Josh Blackman
If, however, the regulations cannot be repealed unilaterally—for example, if the rescission may be subject to judicial review pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)—then under Justice Antonin Scalia’s Morrison v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The UK Supreme Court Blog had a post “Case Preview: WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants” regarding Morrison’s appeal in a data breach claim brought by 5,500 employees. 5RB also had a piece. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The European Commission’s White Paper on Artificial Intelligence has been analysed by the Data Matters Blog. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Freed, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, February 26, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Randi Morrison
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) sent a letter to SEC Chair White earlier this month urging amendments to the proxy statement rules to require that companies disclose each board nominee’s gender, race, and ethnicity – as was proposed by nine large public pension funds in a March 2015 petition to the SEC. [read post]