Search for: "Mosley v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 281
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
In determining the breadth of the margin, a “fair balance” must be struck between rights under Articles 8 and 10 ECHR (Mosley v UK [2011] ECHR 774 [108]-[111]). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
See, Barry Sookman Internet justice: Mosley v Google. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
How do nation states respond? [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
How do nation states respond? [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:38 pm
In one recent case, Bollea v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
This wrongly states that Impress made the damages award. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Doe (Irish High Court, case no. 20121254P); Mosley v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment ZA Council v MT & Ors [2017] EWFC 12 (14 February 2017): An interesting example of extensive redaction This is the published judgment of a decision by Moor J sitting as a High Court Judge in the Family Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
”[2] Earlier, in Powell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
As a result, HDOH ordered this product embargoed (not to be sold, purchased, or consumed) throughout the state, and the temporary closure of all Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
In A.T. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
CG v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:09 pm
F., Mosley, J. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
