Search for: "Mosley v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 9:35 am
Mosley (2015) 60 Cal.4th 1044, 1080 [2] In re Taylor (2015) 60 Cal.4th 1019 [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:04 am
Press release In today’s Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Delfi AS v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
In Matthews v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm
In addition to requiring the state to inform it of just satisfaction to individual applicants, the member state is required to implement general measures to ensure future applicants are not affected. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
“The dispute is settled, to the satisfaction of both sides,” Mosley’s lawyer said. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
However, it will now be considered in the Mosley case. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
Aside from the difficulties that Google and other internet intermediaries are having in determining what is inaccurate, out of date and irrelevant, the reported English cases since Costeja, most notably Daniel Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) and Max Mosley v Google Inc and Google Limited ([2015 ] EWHC 59 (QB)) have highlighted a very significant tension between data protection law and the law of defamation and other content laws (including Article 8… [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:02 pm
And this is where the recent UK case Max Mosley v Google dated 15 January 2015 becomes really fascinating. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
Ten months on from the 13 May 2014 ruling of the Grand Chamber of the European Court in Case C131-12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja Gonzalez, Google has received 234, 384 requests for removal of links and evaluated 850, 385 URLs. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm
In CG v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
See People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
– OBEY the LAW with privacy policy tweaks http://t.co/VqKS2hB9zl -> Mexico says may sanction Google over data protection breach http://t.co/E1oUoHs7Yf -> Digital evidence requires an understanding of 'cyberlaw' http://t.co/drClh4AhSU -> Presentation on the new software installation rules in Canada's Anti-spam Law http://t.co/PiYint3Q9j -> Courts Address the Level of Security Banks Must Provide to Business Accounts http://t.co/HQeyFTHOb6 -> IPC “tweaks”… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 am
At a time when the courts are increasingly having to address complex data protection arguments (see, for example, Mosley, Hegglin and Vidal-Hall) , we should not forgot how useful a subject access request can be in obtaining pre-action disclosure, enabling an individual to see whether s/he has a legitimate basis for issuing a claim in due course. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
The Court rendered a decision in 2011, Mosley v The United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 774 (10 May 2011). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
In Mosley v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:00 pm
See Carey v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
