Search for: "Motion To Transmit The Record" Results 1 - 20 of 662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm by Russell Knight
“All records, dockets and books required by law to be kept by such clerks shall be deemed public records, and shall at all times be open to inspection without fee or reward, and all persons shall have free access for inspection and examination to such records, docket and books, and also to all papers on file in different clerks’ offices and shall have the right to take memoranda and abstracts thereof. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:08 am
Lindor's application for an order compelling the plaintiffs to respond to her interrogatory and document request relating use by record company employees of p2p file sharing as a means of transmitting songs to radio stations:February 16, 2007, Order of Magistrate Judge Robert M. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:02 am by Susan Brenner
The trial judge denied Allen’s motion and “gave his reasoning on the record”, i.e., did not issue a written opinion on the issue: `In this case the uncontroverted testimony . . . presented by the officer as the only one who testified in this matter is that he received 10 individual images. . . . [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:33 am by Phil Dixon
One of the more difficult adjustments for a lawyer moving from district court to superior is that ”upstairs” is a court of record and lawyers must be concerned about preserving the record for appeal. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Matthew Strayer
Pa. 2013) (denying a motion to dismiss for a Wiretap Act claim where the complaint alleged that defendant’s franchisee surreptitiously installed software on a rent-to-own computer that recorded and simultaneously transmitted the user’s keystrokes, screen shots, webcam photographs, and location information to external servers, and that defendant had procured this practice); Klumb v. [read post]
Trump’s attorney, Jesse Binnall, claimed that the second motion was necessary to prevent the National Archives from immediately transmitting documents before they could move to block it. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:12 am
For that and other reasons, the trial court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Without this authority, the Court lacks the power to claw back records already transmitted to the State Registrar of Vital Records and the Central Criminal Records Exchange…. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:55 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Medical records are different than the trash we put out on the curb, or the canceled checks we provide to our bank, or the electrical usage records we transmit to the power company. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Virginia Supreme Court Rule 5:13 required that the Gloucester Circuit Court Clerk to prepare and transmit the entire record in the Gagnon brain injury appeal. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 11:23 am
Because the issue has been forfeited, and because the record before us is insufficient to permit review of the judgment, we affirm. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 9:13 pm by Will Newman
Or they may make a motion before trial to exclude the exhibit through a motion in limine. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 9:13 am by Eugene Volokh
L. c. 272, §§ 28-30D,(3) as “any handwritten or printed material, visual representation, live performance or sound recording including but not limited to, books, magazines, motion picture films, pamphlets, phonographic records, pictures, photographs, figures, statues, plays, dances. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:03 am by John Floyd
  Motion to Suppress Cell Phone Records   Prior to trial, Hankston’s attorney filed a motion to suppress the cell phone records. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:18 pm by Michael White
The new title is Motion Video Signal Processing for Recording or Reproducing. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:33 pm by Daily Record Staff
”) Consequently, the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal because the record transmitted to this Court did not include the transcript of the December 2009 plea hearing is moot. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:51 am
A few months ago, a federal court in California held that Sirius XM digital radio was violating the rights of the eminently forgettable recording group “the Turtles” by transmitting any of the group’s pre-1972 recordings – their rather insipid cover version of Dylan’s “It Ain’t Me, Babe,” (1965) for instance – to subscribers. [read post]