Search for: "Motor Vehicle Administration v. Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
The superior court reversed the revocation on two grounds, finding that there was a lack of evidence that the appellee was operating a motor vehicle and also finding that the procedures of G.S. 20-16.2 deprived the appellee of due process. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 11:42 am
The defendant was placed on 18 months of supervised probation following his guilty pleas to possession of a firearm by a felon, possession of a stolen motor vehicle, fleeing to elude, and RDO. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Bankruptcy: SUPREME COURT HEARS BANKRUPTCY CASE OVER OWNERSHIP COSTS FOR VEHICLES, Ransom v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Delaware: Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
Defendant unsuccessfully moved to suppress the evidence obtained after he rolled down the window and was subsequently found guilty of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Francis was arrested again on June 14, 2017, this time in Nassau County, on two misdemeanor counts: operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192) and driving an uninsured vehicle (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 319). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm
Black Box: Powerful Eye Witness in Car Accident Cases I’m Ed Smith, a Car Accident Attorney in Sacramento. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
On July 16, 2007, Leliefeld was in a work-related motor-vehicle accident. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm
Exception (1.1) Subsection (1) does not apply to an occupant of a motor vehicle or vessel who, on becoming aware that it was taken without the consent of the owner, attempted to leave the motor vehicle or vessel, to the extent that it was feasible to do so, or actually left the motor vehicle or vessel. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
Smith, [1968] S.C.R. 664, 68 D.L.R. (2d) 751, this court held that there had been a violation of solicitor-client privilege when a former solicitor of the plaintiffs in a motor vehicle accident claim was subpoenaed by the defendants and testified as to the settlement discussions that had taken place. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:23 am
Smith J. in McKay v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:06 am
In this week’s case (Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
In that case, No. 96-1405, Smith Industries v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
An administrative law judge had recommended a penalty of suspension without pay for 60 days. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
Smith v. [read post]
