“An application to quash a subpoena should be granted’ [o]nly where the futility of the process to uncover anything legitimate is inevitable or obvious’ . . . or where the information sought is ‘utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry’ ” (Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Abrams, 71NY2d327, 331-332 [1988]; see Myrie vShelley, 237 AD2d 337, 338 [1997]; cf Ayubo v Eastman Kodak Co., 158 AD2d 641, 642 [ 1990]). [read post]