Search for: "Motus v. Pfizer Inc."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 10:46 am
See Motus v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:08 am
Motus v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 2000 WL 1738645 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 819 F. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Danek Medical, Inc., 1999 WL 1054864, *6 (M.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Philip Morris, Inc., ___ P.3d ___, 2009 WL 1563373 (Nev. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Plough, Inc., 6 Cal.4th 539, 555-56 (1993); (summary judgment required where drug warnings were never read); Motus v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
Pfizer Inc., 358 F.3d 659 (9th Cir. 2004). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm
California law is quite good, going back even before Motus v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (holding that state common law torts were something that was subject to preemption), Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 358 F.3d 659, 661 (9th Cir. 2004) (“the doctor who prescribed [the drug] . . . failed to read [the defendant’s] published warnings before prescribing the drug. [read post]
