Search for: "Mountford"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Migration Policy, African Population Growth and Global Inequality by Andrew Mountford (Royal Holloway, University of London Hillel Rapoport Bar-Ilan University - Department of Economics); Stanford University IZA Discussion Paper No. 8329 Abstract: According to recent UN projections more than 50... [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:59 am
., James Mountford, M.D., Lawrence G. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 4:03 pm
Yesterday judgment was handed down by the Court of Appeal in a case in which I appeared called Mountford v Newlands School in which a school was found vicariously liable for injuries caused in a rugby match when a teacher played someone over the age group for the match. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 7:29 am
The report also noted Peter Mountford but did not mention his controversial patent (US 7,256,041). [read post]
9 May 2008, 12:43 am
Margaret Mountford, Sir Alan Sugar's sidekick, reckons that Edinburgh University is to blame. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:16 pm
In the area of stem cells, Smith and Mountford obtained US 7,256,041 on 14 Aug. 2007, with first claimA method of isolating mammalian stem cells from a population of mammalian cells, comprising: (a) culturing mammalian cells containing a nucleic acid construct including a selectable marker operably linked to a promoter that preferentially expresses the selectable marker in mammalian stem cells; and (b) isolating mammalian stem cells expressing the selectable marker. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:47 pm
Mountford in 1985. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:27 am
Mountford. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 11:04 pm
In that case, Mrs Mountford signed an agreement which stated that she had a license. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
–Table of Contents after the jump.1 Keppell v Bailey (1834); Hill v Tupper (1863) The Numerus Clausus and the Common LawBen McFarlane2 Todrick v Western National Omnibus Co Ltd (1934) The Interpretation of EasementsPeter Butt3 Re Ellenborough Park (1955) A Mere Recreation and AmusementElizabeth Cooke4 Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd; Old & Campbell Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society (1979)Stitching Together Modern EstoppelMartin Dixon5 Federated Homes… [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:32 am
Mountford in 1985. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:49 pm
Mountford. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:07 pm
That satisfied two of the criteria for a tenancy in Street v Mountford (1985) 1 AC 809. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:36 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ibrahim & Ors, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 880 (23 April 2008) Clarke v R [2008] EWCA Crim 651 (23 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Campaign To End All Animal Experiments (t/a The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 417 (23 April 2008) Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 358 (23 April 2008) High Court… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:22 pm
Mountford which was decided in 1985. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:36 pm
Mountford which was decided in 1985. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 12:12 am
Mountford in 1985. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:25 pm
Mountford in 1985, it was held that an essential element of a tenancy was ‘exclusive occupation’ of a property, even if that was just a room. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:20 pm
Mountford which set out the three elements: Exclusive occupation of property For a fixed or periodic term At a rent Now in your case there is a term and a rent, but no exclusive occupation. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:46 pm
Mountford, decided that if someone has exclusive occupation at a rent then it is a tenancy whatever it says on the piece of paper the occupiers sign. [read post]
