Search for: "Movant's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause"
Results 1 - 20
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
After a close look at each of these putative justifications, the Court concludes that the CTA is not authorized by the Constitution. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 11:41 am
The court, in an opinion and order by District Judge Thomas W. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:08 am
To justify a successive summary judgment motion, purportedly “new” evidence must have been “unavailable to [the movant] before the prior motion[.] [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
[The opinion was decided July 21, but was originally issued sealed; it was just unsealed today, in response to my motion to unseal.] [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
The mother’s testimony, which the Family Court credited, established that the father pulled a rug out from under her, causing her to fall. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 8:15 am
“Except for good cause shown, the movant shall provide a minimum of 24 hours’ notice to the opposing side” Cook County Domestic Relations Administrative Order 2021 AO 3(3) You will not even get 24 hours, in reality. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
It presupposes that there has been or could be some compelling showing of a Fourth Amendment violation—the remedy for which is the return of property seized. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm
In response, Bratt announces that the filter team is in court today; he would defer to its judgment on the status report. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 10:10 am
When Alfasigma brought the page back online, in response to consumers’ questions, Alfasigma repeatedly responded: “VSL#3® was temporarily not available for sale while a packaging update was being made to comply with the court’s final order. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am
Let’s see why the Court might have felt compelled to order a hearing on a petition for which the respondent failed to show any real defense. [read post]
5 May 2022, 6:39 am
“This factor requires the movant to demonstrate at least a fair chance of prevailing,” or an “adequate showing of a nexus between the unlawful conduct and the responsible individuals. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:41 pm
Good cause to file documents under seal has been found where, as here, public access to the documents or information at issue is likely to cause harm to the movant. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
As to the motion, Opposer Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) failed to show good cause for modification of the SPO. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:38 pm
The object of a signature is to show mutuality or assent” Lynge v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:47 pm
Federal Trade Commission 21-86Issues: (1) Whether Congress impliedly stripped federal district courts of jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to the Federal Trade Commission’s structure, procedures, and existence by granting the courts of appeals jurisdiction to “affirm, enforce, modify, or set aside” the Commission’s cease-and desist orders; and (2) whether, on the merits, the structure of the Federal Trade Commission, including the… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
(NYU), and Regional Court Judge Dr. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:33 pm
Because there is nothing private or confidential about a paid advertisement in a newspaper—especially one as well-intentioned as the tribute here[—]the Court will deny Plaintiff's motion to file Exhibit B to her Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause under seal…. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
Courts typically issue a temporary restraining order (or “TRO”) in emergency situations pending the “return date” (i.e., the date on which all motion papers are finally submitted to the court at the end of the motion briefing process), to prohibit conduct that could alter the “status quo” and cause the movant “irreparable harm. [read post]
