Search for: "Movant's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause"
Results 41 - 60
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2018, 7:45 am
MACC Venture Partners, decided by Vice-Chancellor Sam Glasscock III, one of the five members of the Delaware Court of Chancery, discusses this issue in some detail, and I think offers a very good analysis: The road to a temporary restraining order ("TRO") is well-worn; it typically requires only that a movant show a non-frivolous claim of wrongdoing, and resulting threatened imminent irreparable harm, to trigger equity's solicitude. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:59 am
The issue on appeal is whether the movant met the summary judgment burden by establishing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The Court recognized that there could be a variety of avenues for a movant to prove standing. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The Court recognized that there could be a variety of avenues for a movant to prove standing. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
“When reviewing a trial court order dismissing a cause for want of jurisdiction, Texas appellate courts ‘construe the pleadings in favor of the plaintiff and look to the pleader’s intent. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But the government waived its right to file a responsive brief, so unless [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:08 pm
It asks the Court to jump in with an order preventing a party from taking some action to prevent an irreparable harm to the movant. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
The court presumably will direct the government to file a response before it grants relief to petitioner Jonathon Lamb. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
Nor do they dispute that those violations caused harm to thousands of consumers. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
Nor do they dispute that those violations caused harm to thousands of consumers. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
*** The loan-contract proof and chain-of-title issues are the subject of another post on the implementation of the CFPB consent order and proposed judgment. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
In a traditional summary-judgment motion, the movant has the burden to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the trial court should grant judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
We render an order granting Cash Biz's motion. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
If the movant shows that a valid arbitration agreement encompasses the lawsuit's claims, and the opposing party has not proven a defense to enforcement of the agreement, the trial court has no discretion but to compel arbitration and stay the suit. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Starting with the general rules in Texas, a creditor must sue for payment of debt "not later than four years after the day the cause of action accrues. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Defendant failed to file a Response opposing Plaintiff's Motion.After reviewing the attached billing invoices and Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
(They also asserted other causes of action). [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
The trial court must grant the motion unless the non-movant produces more than a scintilla of evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact on the challenged elements. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
We will affirm the trial court's orders. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
It is, needless to say, the responsibility of counsel to make such a motion in timely fashion and to show good cause for the requested sealing. [read post]
