Search for: "Movant's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause"
Results 61 - 80
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
She also asks this court to order a new trial in the interest of justice. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:55 pm
Amending legal rights and responsibilities also requires that the movant show a change in circumstances, but the burden is lower. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
" Nella then showed me her new [w]ill and I noticed that she had written on it. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:44 am
” ExeGi responded that it put the Disclaimer on every page of the website to be responsive to VSL’s concerns, at the bottom of the page in a “black box” to signal its importance to medical professionals.VSL also complained that ExeGi sales reps told people in at least three doctors’ offices that VSL#3 was no longer being sold.VSL moved to hold the De Simone parties in civil contempt, which requires violation of the terms of a valid decree that… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:52 pm
No claimant shall be entitled to enforce payment of a claim in any proceedings in the court unless the claim be presented in accordance with the provisions of this section or unless it shall be based upon a decree or order of the court or a valid judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Rather, the Court requires "significant probative evidence" from the nonmovant in order to dismiss a request for summary judgment supported appropriately by the movant. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:07 am
The Federal Rule now states:[u]nless otherwise limited by court order ... [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 2:12 pm
The movant must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence in admissible form to demonstrate the absence of any material issue of fact. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
The plaintiff did not have to show that Dr. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 8:34 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said that upon the following papers numbered 1 to 41 read on these motions for intervention and preliminary injunction; Order to Show Cause and supporting papers 1-10: 11-20 ; Notice of Cross Motion and supporting papers ; Answering Affidavits and supporting papers 21 - 37 ; Replying Affidavits and supporting papers 38-41 ; Other _; (and after hearing counsel in support and opposed to the motion) it is, Ordered that the within two (2)… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
. . .On March 13, 2015, the day following the filing of the Complaint, this Court issued an ex parte Order to Show Cause why an injunction should not issue that, inter alia, (1) enjoined Defendants, their affiliates and all persons acting in concert with them from using, disclosing, or otherwise disseminating the Stolen Materials, (2) ordered Defendants to turn over to Plaintiff the Stolen Materials, and (3) ordered… [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
No response is on file as of 9/24/2015. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
But they brought other causes of action also. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Summary judgment is appropriate where `the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Summary judgment is appropriate where `the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING CAUSES DENIED [June 26, 2015 Texas Supreme Court Order List] 13-0573 THE FREDERICKSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
And even if the cause of action was time-barred, would the court then still have authority to so rule on the merits? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
And even if the cause of action was time-barred, would the court then still have authority to so rule on the merits? [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:56 am
The Court found that Petitioner had set forth specific facts that clearly showed that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage would result to the movant before the adverse party could be heard in opposition. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
After six months, Blake's employment was terminated, allegedly for cause. [read post]
