Search for: "Mr. Booker"
Results 21 - 40
of 239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2011, 3:29 pm
” (UK Human Rights Blog – earlier post on Mr Booker here). [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 6:56 am
Booker was arrested and spent more than 18 months in jail awaiting trial before his defense lawyer discovered that Mr. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
Mr Booker does not assert first hand knowledge of the case himself. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:14 pm
Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey... [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:13 am
As a group, they are a strikingly heterogeneous array of rivals for Mr. [read post]
30 Jun 2005, 8:20 am
MR. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
A year later, when Mr. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Not surprisingly, Judge Bellamy was critical of what Mr Booker had to say about the case. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:36 pm
Mr Booker does not assert first hand knowledge of the case himself. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 3:59 pm
This sometimes happens, Mr Booker. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
The festival has been run by Mr. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 11:22 am
Even so, in the present poisonous atmosphere 94 votes is a very good start, and we congratulate Mr. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
We might contrast it with a fictional vegetarian one.In Graham Greene’s darkly comic novel about Haiti under Papa Doc, The Comedians, the reader meets Mr. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:15 pm
The Tenth Circuit discusses at length post-Booker sentencing realities today in US v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:48 am
BOOKER, Mr. [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 9:00 am
I am a big fan of increased sentencing discretion post-Booker, but I am troubled by the prospect of a sentencing judge saying something like this: "I see, Mr. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 1:50 pm
Here is today's pacer entry:11/30/2007 ORDER filed granting petition for en banc rehearing [3670756-2] filed by Mr. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:47 pm
Despite a well-deserved reputation for rigorous reasonableness review after Booker, the Eighth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:53 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the Sentencing Guidelines were no longer “diktats. [read post]
