Search for: "Mr. Booker"
Results 41 - 60
of 239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 7:04 pm
The district court sentenced Mr. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:38 pm
Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:33 am
"With the President's appellation of 'excessive' to describe Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:21 pm
Mr. and Mrs. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:57 am
Mr. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
' Mr. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Booker, Mr. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:02 pm
Politano, No. 06-2342 affirms an upward Booker variance. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:22 am
Raybon.)Mr. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
Mr Booker offered the view that non-engagement of families with the child protection system in fact stems from parents finding experts and lawyers biased; that the family courts regularly remove children from their parents for nothing more than failure to co- operate with professionals; and that as such, McFarlane LJ’s expressed concern about risk of unnecessarily poor outcomes for children and families encouraged not to engage with the child protection system, simply show… [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
Mr. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
You can go back and compare them with what Mr Booker sees and says. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 6:01 am
Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 10:18 am
However, since Mr. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 9:13 am
Jose Francisco Gama-Gonzalez, No. 06-1965 (December 5, 2006): Mr. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 7:48 am
Mr. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 8:08 am
This discussion emphasizes that Booker does not change the message of 28 U.S.C. sec. 994(h). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:12 am
Why are you so obsessed with me, Mr. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:26 pm
Mr. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 4:17 am
" As the article further explains, the "53-to-40 vote made Mr. [read post]
