Search for: "Muir v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
In this case, X v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2021] EWHC 355 (Fam)), the claimant demanded the recognition by the UK authorities of her child’s adoption in Nigeria. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:18 pm
Muir v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:12 am
Second, the entity for whom Muir worked had a track record of “dishonesty” in court proceedings. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
In the recent case of Accord Healthcare v Medac Gesellschaft [2016] EWHC 24 (Pat), Birss J noted that if an invention is not obvious over concrete prior art, the Court is entitled to be sceptical that it is nevertheless obvious over the CGK alone (see paras 119-124).Jamie Muir Wood reviewed the recent decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2016] EWHC 576 (Pat) (the third technical trial, which involved a standard essential patent), where an… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:22 pm
In today’s case (Easton v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 8:49 am
Div. 1991); Muir v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
But as the Sixth Circuit noted in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:00 am
Platnick v. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 6:08 am
Conley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am
Dana Muir analyzes Monday’s second argument, in Thole v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Muir, 230 Kan. 618, 641 P.2d 384 (1982). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:09 pm
Supreme Court and the Future of Human Rights Keitner on Human Rights Enforcement through Transnational Litigation New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
Muir, 136 Cal. 36, 48 (1902); Nollan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
Dana Muir analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:08 am
-Dieter Martiny on the PIL dimensions of the 2010 agreement between France and Germany on a new optional matrimonial property regime. - Horatia Muir Watt on the follow-up to Kiobel (the case of Sexual Minorities v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
Vancouver personal injury law firm Klein Lyons had a duty to advise its client before letting him sign a retainer and contingency fee agreement, according to the Supreme Court of British Columbia.In Klein Lyons v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:34 am
Duffy was co-counsel in the important Supreme Court case KSR v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
The UK Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in Vedanta v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20 and Okpabi v Shell [2021] UKSC 3 have granted jurisdiction and allowed such claims to proceed on the merits in English courts. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:10 am
Furthermore, as stated in the syllabus for his presentation (posted on his blog) Hindert will apparently be coaching people seeking to invest in factoring deals. [read post]
