Search for: "Mulli v. Mulli"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
Hardeep Singh is a freelance journalist and was the defendant in His Holiness v Singh. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
The draft Defamation Bill has provoked a range of responses, including those of Dominic Crossley and my colleague Alastair Mullis published here on Inforrm. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am
Nevertheless, as Professor Mullis and Dr Scott have argued “the good name of a company, as that of an individual, is a thing of value. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
Next week we will have further papers and a report on the revisiting of the intellectual foundations of libel law in the paper by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
And those sponsors include some of the most prominent members of the Senate - Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers (Email) of Woodstock, Senate President Pro Tem Tommie Williams (Email), Transportation Committee Chairman Jeff Mullis (Email) of Chickamauga, and Chief Deputy Whip John Wiles (Email) of Cobb County, among others. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
In Dillon v Cush; Dillon v Boland ([2010] NSWCA 165) the New South Wales Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendant on the basis that the judge’s analysis of qualified privilege and malice was flawed. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am
The speakers will be Mark Lewis, Jonathan Coad, Professor Alastair Mullis and Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:11 pm
This is curious because this principle already forms part of English law, having been established 20 years ago in the case of Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm
Mahmood, Constitutional Forum, Centre for Constitutional Studies, Forthcoming ‘Newspaper Libel: With Special Emphasis on Indian Case Law’, Nayan Banerjee, National Law School of India University (NLSIU) ‘Defamation Outside Reputation: Proposals for the Reform of English Law‘, Eric Descheemaeker, University of Edinburgh – School of Law, U. of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper No. 2011/41 ‘New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:33 am
In Thornton v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
This is an area which has been extensively discussed by a number of commentators, notably Professor Mullis and Dr Scott, and I will only provide a brief outline of the arguments here. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
On the contrary as Professor Mullis and others have pointed out, all the major changes in recent years have been in favour of the media: the development of Reynolds privilege from 1999 and its strengthening recently in Jameel; the introduction of the offer of amends procedure, and the ability of the Court of Appeal to control the award of damages by juries. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
Senate Bill 276By: Senators Staton of the 18th, Harp of the 29th, Shafer of the 48th, Murphy of the 27th, Mullis of the 53rd and others AS PASSED AN ACTTo amend Title 33 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to insurance, so as to limit coverages under uninsured motorist provisions to automobile and motor vehicle liability policies and exclude umbrella and excess liability policies; to change the definition of "uninsured motor vehicle" to allow uninsured… [read post]
