Search for: "Mulli v. Mulli"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
Next week we will have further papers and a report on the revisiting of the intellectual foundations of libel law in the paper by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
This is an area which has been extensively discussed by a number of commentators, notably Professor Mullis and Dr Scott, and I will only provide a brief outline of the arguments here. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am
Nevertheless, as Professor Mullis and Dr Scott have argued “the good name of a company, as that of an individual, is a thing of value. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
In Dillon v Cush; Dillon v Boland ([2010] NSWCA 165) the New South Wales Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendant on the basis that the judge’s analysis of qualified privilege and malice was flawed. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
The consequence of this is presumably that, should a case with similar facts to Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers ([2001] EWCA Civ 33.) [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
This post is an abridged version of a paper which will appear in the journal Communications Law later this year and which can be read here in draft. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
Reputation, as Lord Nicholls explained in Reynolds v Times Newspapers, does matter, and not merely for its service to the individual concerned: ‘Reputation is an integral and important part of the dignity of the individual. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
On the contrary as Professor Mullis and others have pointed out, all the major changes in recent years have been in favour of the media: the development of Reynolds privilege from 1999 and its strengthening recently in Jameel; the introduction of the offer of amends procedure, and the ability of the Court of Appeal to control the award of damages by juries. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
The defence failed in Hunter v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
And those sponsors include some of the most prominent members of the Senate - Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers (Email) of Woodstock, Senate President Pro Tem Tommie Williams (Email), Transportation Committee Chairman Jeff Mullis (Email) of Chickamauga, and Chief Deputy Whip John Wiles (Email) of Cobb County, among others. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
Mullis v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
Senate Bill 276By: Senators Staton of the 18th, Harp of the 29th, Shafer of the 48th, Murphy of the 27th, Mullis of the 53rd and others AS PASSED AN ACTTo amend Title 33 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to insurance, so as to limit coverages under uninsured motorist provisions to automobile and motor vehicle liability policies and exclude umbrella and excess liability policies; to change the definition of "uninsured motor vehicle" to allow uninsured… [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:19 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Toby Mullis v. [read post]
