Search for: "Mulligan v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
  While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25]  Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26]  Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:41 am by Howard Wasserman
The schedule of panels after the jump (thanks to Lou Mulligan and Jamelle Sharp, the two most recent hosts of the conference) for their help in selecting and organizing the papers. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:27 am by SHG
Was the rule of Georgia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
There’s been much written about the Fifth Circuit’s en banc ruling in Alvarez v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
(That Supreme Court case, Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:50 am
Key to answering the question of which rights will trump was the 2001 Supreme Court of Canada case Trinity Western University v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 8:21 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” Instead, it framed the issue as one of proximate cause, under the authority of Southern States Power Company v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:14 am by SHG
In other words, the decision did little more than to tell the judge below to take a Mulligan under Auer v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:37 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Thorkildsen v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:49 am by Steve McConnell
We hate to start the New Year by reporting on a dismal case but, as we said on Friday, the Montana Supreme Court's decision in Stevens v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:14 pm
The SCOTUS Blog has, as usual, the most concise summary about the case, Sprint/United Management v. [read post]