Search for: "Munley, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
July 7, 2023 Munley, Julia, J.), the court denied a Defendant’s Motion for an Amendment of an Order for the purpose of seeking an interlocutory appeal. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Munley of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania denied the carrier’s Motion for Summary Judgment on a UIM statute of limitations defense in the case of Legos v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Munley for the Middle District of Pennsylvania's decision in the case of Noone v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Munley for the Middle District of Pennsylvania's decision in the case of Noone v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 9:07 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
§1447(e) (“If after removal the Plaintiff seeks to join additional Defendants whose joinder would destroy subject matter jurisdiction, the Court may deny joinder, or permit joinder and remand the action to the State Court”).Judge Munley noted that “[t]he United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has not established how a district court should apply §1447(e). [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 6:27 pm
The Keeton Group, et al, No:09cv504 (Judge Munley) was, frankly, more understandable in that it involved a determination of state law upon issues never addressed by the state courts. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:40 am
" The Times-Tribune of Scranton, Pennsylvania reports that "Judge Munley's ruling against student in MySpace case upheld by appeals court. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 2:43 am
Judge Munley also rejected the plaintiff's claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress claim in this bad faith claim.The remainder of the opinion addresses procedural issues with respect to the wording of the Complaint.It remains to be seen whether this case will be (or even can be at this stage) appealed to the Third Circuit. [read post]
12 May 2009, 6:00 am
Munley, J., had ruled in favor of the insured, holding that addition of more vehicles to what had been single-vehicle policy was a purchase of multi-vehicle policy that required insurer to obtain waiver of intra-policy stacking. 559 F.Supp.2d 540 (M.D.Pa. 2008).The Third Circuit reversed and remanded with instructions that summary judgment be entered in favor of the insurance carrier instead. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:26 pm
The blogosphere is abuzz with the news: WSJ Law Blog, TalkLeft, Sentencing Law & Policy (1, 2), Ars Technica, How Appealing (1, 2, 3), Prawfsblawg (1, 2, 3, 4, 5),  Concurring Opinions, Newark Star-Ledger, Reuters, Scranton Times-Tribune, and the Associated Press. [read post]