Search for: "Munoz v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 2:49 pm
Among the orders, the Court granted the State’s request to appear as amicus curiae to argue in MIRTA ZORRILLA v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P., 22 S.W.3d 857, 864 (Tex. 2000). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 10:25 am
(See Scheiding v Dinwiddie Constr. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 2:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
This is a group effort of a number of attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Kathleen Schulman, Mariana Munoz-Parsons and myself. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
This is a group effort of a number of attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Kathleen Schulman, Mariana Munoz-Parsons and myself. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
Washington, in which the justices will consider whether a plaintiff must pursue all available administrative remedies through the state to be eligible to bring a federal civil rights claim; and Department of State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Generally, a process server’s affidavit of service establishes a prime facie case as to the method of service and, therefore, gives rise to a presumption of proper serviceIn Matter of Reyes v Munoz, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226157 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
See Munoz v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:22 am
Sapp and Sturgill and their client Maribel Munoz have covered a larger area. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
CRUM, Defendant.Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-3522-B.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
” Munoz v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
” Munoz v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
Lots of proponents of the use of drones in warfare tout fewer pilots put at risk in dangerous missions, but what about the financial cost of drones v. manned aircraft? [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 3:00 pm
In Munoz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
The judge ruled for both the claim of the Plaintiff and the counterclaim of the Defendant and denied any damages to either party. _______________________________________________________ In another June 2023 decision in Munoz v. [read post]
