Search for: "Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners" Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
He was found disabled by both the NYCERS Medical Board and an outside health provider after medical examinations. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
First, courts place a positive obligation on each party to identify all of the documents in their possession or control that may be “relevant” to issues in the litigation, and to produce each such document unless privilege is claimed over it.20 Second, lawyers are allowed to question a representative of each adverse party under oath â€" a process referred to as “examination for discovery”. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Grape, No. 07-3682 District Court order allowing the Government to forcibly medicate defendant, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1291, is affirmed where the Government has presented sufficiently important interests to forcibly medicate defendant, an incarcerated paranoid schizophrenic charged with child sex offenses. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:04 am
LEXIS 7626 April 10, 2008, Decided “Ordon retained Karpie to represent him in proceedings before the Connecticut Medical Examining Board ("CMEB") after a patient reported to the Connecticut Department of Public Health ("CDPH") an adverse result in a surgery performed by plaintiff. [read post]