Search for: "Murphy v. California"
Results 221 - 240
of 572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
For The Washington Post, Rick Maese reports that “[t]he four major U.S. sports leagues have been bracing for” the possibility that the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
Torralba-Mendia, No. 13-10064 (Murphy (E.D. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
See United Parcel Service Wage and Hour Cases, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2011).With regard to meal and rest periods, the Court rejected the employer’s argument that the California Supreme Court’s analysis in Murphy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Although the Supreme Court in Murphy Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 4:28 pm
"In Murphy v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:00 am
This was finally settled by the California Supreme Court's Murphy v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 2:13 pm
Genesco Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
WeidemanEmployers have reason to hope that their liability for missed meal periods may be less than some first thought when the California Supreme Court issued its much-publicized ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 11:40 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
As Justice Murphy wrote in dissent in Eisler v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:15 pm
Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:43 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) or the deferential balancing test used for zoning restrictions under Penn Central Trans. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm
Such petitions are subject to dismissal, see Rose v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 11:16 am
See Kindred Nursing Centers LP v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 1:00 pm
Rudin, 1996 WL 79861 (S.D.N.Y.) the court observed that California has no novelty requirement for contracts involving ideas (citing Desny v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court issued a powerful decision in Flowers v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
” Murphy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
This issue is, of course, now pending before the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
