Search for: "Murphy v. California"
Results 81 - 100
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 12:44 pm
And do we have a preview of California v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
An e-mail just received from my Law Librarian, Erin Murphy, identifies the pith of the trial court judgment against Proposition 8, the voter initiative that made a prohibition on same-sex marriage part of California's Constitution. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:42 pm
Whitt v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Legal scholar Garrett Epps and Slate commentator Mark Joseph Stern see Murphy v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
For example, in 1958, a California court allowed a physician to testify about what nurses should have done saying, "Surely a qualified doctor would know what was standard procedure of nurses to follow" (Goff v Doctor's Hospital, 166 CalApp2d 314, 319 [1958]). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
The answer to both questions is no.A few years ago, when we were all waiting for a decision in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 12:34 pm
Six characteristics, set forth in a California Supreme Court case called Tunkl. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:29 pm
The Court then explained its holding in light of Murphy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:17 pm
In a decision of great interest to California employers, the California Supreme Court yesterday agreed to settle the dispute among California's Courts of Appeal regarding whether the "payment" of one hour's pay at the employee's usual rate for a missed meal and/or break period mandated by California Labor Code §226.7 is a "wage" subject to a three- or four- year statute of limitations or a… [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:52 am
In Naranjo v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:50 am
Answer: By David Murphy and Gabrielle Wirth First, let’s talk about the law in the Ninth Circuit, which governs the West Coast, and California. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
” See Murphy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeal – First District: In re Rafael C., 2016 WL 1178374 (2016). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
The ruling is notable in underscoring how the Supreme Court's sports-betting decision in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
One of the best published opinions regarding the executive exemption was Murphy v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:27 am
(E.g., Murphy v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Superior Court (4/12/12) --- Cal.4th ---, was probably the most highly anticipated Supreme Court employment law decision since Murphy v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:34 pm
Murphy Oil USA and Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:15 am
United States, 179 F.3d 29, 35 (1999), but says it has been undercut by Murphy v. [read post]
