Search for: "Murphy v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2010, 9:17 pm by Josh Wright
But in reading Commissioner Rosch’s separate statement on the new HMGs, I was intrigued by what seems to be a mistake the Commissioner has made repeatedly. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This cannot be correct as a matter of principle, and that raises very serious doubts about to the correctness of Collins. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by James Hamilton
Title V of the Act is the Swap Data Repository and ClearinghouseIndemnification Correction Act. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
He has said that he believed he legally had to correct the police commissioner’s comment that he was a person of interest. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The deputy commissioner erroneously concluded that the claimant’s employment neither exacerbated nor contributed to the injurious altercation. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Murphy v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 381 criminal defence lawyer Chris Murphy was awarded damages of Aus$110,000. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
A further 32 complaints were received by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO), who informed Elia Bols that a fine of £100,000 would be issued. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal found that the original judgment was thorough, fair and well-reasoned and correct. [read post]