Search for: "Murphy v. Commissioner of IRS"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:19 am
Circuit panel's original opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 5:51 pm
In Romano-Murphy v Commissioner, 152 T.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:11 pm
IRS, the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
This is presumably because the Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing (above) 503 (Finlay CJ);Doyle v Garda Commissioner [1999] 1 IR 249, [1998] 1 ILRM 229, [1997] IEHC 147 (27 August 1997); and see Warman v Fournier 2010 ONSC 2126 (CanLII) (3 May 2010)). [read post]
Sunlight is the best disinfectant: open justice and company law proceedings in Ireland – Eoin O’Dell
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm
As to the first, no privilege arose on the facts; and, even if one did, the interests of justice required that it be precluded (Smurfit Paribas Bank Ltd v AAB Export Finance Ltd [1990] 1 IR 469 (SC); Murphy v Kirwan [1993] 3 IR 501 (SC); Miley v Flood [2001] 1 ILRM 489, [2001] 2 IR 50, [2001] IEHC 9 (24 January 2001); Fyffes v DCC [2005] 1 IR 59 (SC), [2005] IESC 3 (27 January 2005) applied). [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Feeney J effectively held that the plaintiff was entitled to ordinary compensatory damages, but he failed to appreciate that such damages include damages for distress (Conway v Ireland [1991] 2 IR 305, 317, [1991] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ; Griffin J and McCarthy JJ concurring); Shortt v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2007] 4 IR 587, 612, [2007] IESC 9 (21 March 2007) [82] (Murray CJ), [2007] 4 IR 587,… [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:54 am
Supreme Court decision (Brady v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 7:08 am
When the IRS took the position that Murphy's damages were taxable, it essentially made a two-step analysis. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:23 pm
In addition, NSSTA's Legal Committee Update included a summary of a 2011 tax case, Espinoza v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Nine judges say no, which is good news for Timothy Pate, a/k/a Akenaten Ali, the self-described "heir to the kingdom of Morrocco," who was convicted of filing retaliatory liens against property owned by a former Commissioner of the IRS and a former Secretary of the Treasury after the IRS refused to refund him $2.7 million in taxes in 2015. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/5vG Cash v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Commissioner,[28] the court found that the taxpayer was violating the no private benefits provision when it primarily served one political party over the other, and the evidence lacked in trying to be nonpartisan. [read post]
