Search for: "Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
The defendant insurance company cancelled a motor insurance policy on the plaintiff’s motor trading business. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
(B) 'Insured' means the named insured and, while resident of the same household, the spouse of any such named insured and relatives of either, while in a motor vehicle or otherwise; any person who uses, with the expressed or implied consent of the named insured, the motor vehicle to which the policy applies; a guest in such motor vehicle to which the policy applies; or the personal representatives of any of the above. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
NEMA contended that the relevant statutory definition unambiguously excluded all such motors exceeding 1 horsepower, as well as certain motors rated at and less than 1 horsepower, from being regulated as small electric motors. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
The Commissioner affirmed the ALJ. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Murphy Oil Appeal – Dismisses Appeal on Procedural Grounds, Not Merits. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Murphy Oil Appeal – Dismisses Appeal on Procedural Grounds, Not Merits. [read post]
