Search for: "Murphy v. Light" Results 101 - 120 of 402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 4:31 pm
Viewed in this light, the $50 million punitive damage award represented approximately six times [defendant's] annual income. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
  So the sole issue is whether the blanket prohibition on “political advertising” as laid down by sections 319 and 321 of the Communications Act 2003 is necessary in a democratic society within the meaning of Article 10(2) – particularly in the light of the way in which this provision has been interpreted by the Court in three cases: VgT, Murphy and TV Vest. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]